Five facts that compel a Biden impeachment inquiry

From Jonathan Turley, one of the few remaining Democrat straight shooters.

Here are the five facts in a nutshell, but be sure to read his entire editorial.

It is almost 100% certain that any impeachment that is passed by the House will die in the Senate. Knowing this, it is important that the facts about Biden family corruption be widely disseminated, so that as many people as possible become familiar with them. We already know that most of the media outlets will do their best to hide them.

The Messenger

First, there appears to be evidence that Joe Biden lied to the public for years in denying knowledge of his son’s business dealings. Hunter Biden’s ex-business associate, Tony Bobulinski, has said repeatedly that he discussed some dealings directly with Joe Biden. Devon Archer, Hunter’s close friend and partner, described the president’s denials of knowledge as “categorically false.”[. . .]

Second, we know that more than $20 million was paid to the Bidens by foreign sources, including figures in China, Ukraine, Russia and Romania. There is no apparent reason for the multilayers of accounts and companies other than to hide these transfers. Some of these foreign figures have allegedly told others they were buying influence with Joe Biden, and Hunter himself repeatedly invoked his father’s name — including a text exchange with a Chinese businessman in which he said his father was sitting next to him as Hunter demanded millions in payment.

[. . .] Third, specific demands were made on Hunter, including dealing with the threat of a Ukrainian prosecutor to the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, where Hunter was given a lucrative board position. Five days later, Joe Biden forced the Ukrainians to fire the prosecutor, even though State Department and intelligence reports suggested that progress was being made on corruption. Likewise, despite warnings from State Department officials that Hunter was undermining anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine, he continued to receive high-level meetings with then-Secretary of State John Kerry and other State Department officials.

Fourth, Hunter repeatedly stated in emails that he paid his father as much as half of what he earned. There also are references to deals that included free office space and other perks for Joe Biden and his wife; other emails reference how Joe and Hunter Biden would use the same accounts and credit cards. Beyond those alleged direct benefits, Joe Biden clearly benefited from money going to his extended family.

Fifth, there is evidence of alleged criminal conduct by Hunter that could be linked to covering up these payments, from the failure to pay taxes to the failure to register as a foreign lobbyist. What is not established is the assumption by many that Joe Biden was fully aware of both the business dealings and any efforts to conceal them.

The White House is reportedly involved in marshaling the media to swat down any further investigation. In a letter drafted by the White House Counsel’s office, according to a CNN report media executives were told they need to “ramp up their scrutiny” of House Republicans “for opening an impeachment inquiry based on lies.” It is a dangerous erosion of separation between the White House and the president’s personal legal team. Yet, many in the media have previously followed such directions from the Biden team — from emphasizing the story that the laptop might be “Russian disinformation” to an unquestioning acceptance of the president’s denial of any knowledge of his son’s dealings.

This entry was posted in 2024 Presidential Race, Biden Corruption, Congress. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Five facts that compel a Biden impeachment inquiry

  1. Pa Hermit's avatar Pa Hermit says:

    What empty vessels of ethics and consciousness! Now I better understand no God in their environment!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Stella's avatar Stella says:

    Is it too suspicious of me to think that maybe this impeachment inquiry is designed to provide an excuse to replace Biden as the Dem candidate for President? That would allow them to select someone other than Kamala.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Stella Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.