Pelosi says Trump must prove his innocence????

Apparently Nancy – and the staffer who wrote this – doesn’t understand our justice system, in which we are innocent until proven guilty.

Watch:

This entry was posted in 2024 Presidential Race, Constitution, Democrat corruption. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Pelosi says Trump must prove his innocence????

  1. auscitizenmom's avatar auscitizenmom says:

    Her arrogance and ignorance never cease to amaze me.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Pa Hermit's avatar Pa Hermit says:

    Is Faux news biased much??? There is very little room here to play devils’ advocate! The hag Pelosi has been around since the early 60’s I recall a pic of here and JFK. After 6 decades she is still as useless as that proverbial hind teat on a boar hog!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Lucille's avatar Lucille says:

    In the system of justice she believes in, people ARE NOT presumed to be innocent but instead are presumed to be guilty. It’s perfectly fine with her that her political enemies are indicted simply because they won’t cease trying to maintain America as a Constitutional Republic. She’d be perfectly OK with a dictatorship as long as her vision is followed…indeed, that is what she has supported for many years.

    Like

    • Sharon's avatar Sharon says:

      “In the system of justice she believes in, people ARE NOT presumed to be innocent but instead are presumed to be guilty…”

      …..unless her husband is involved.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. texan59's avatar texan59 says:

    One night I talk about how patient we and Trump must be, then you put something like this up here and I just want to go throat-p*nch her. Breathe deep………breathe deep……………..

    Liked by 2 people

  5. resolute's avatar resolute says:

    “Apparently Nancy – and the staffer who wrote this – doesn’t understand our justice system, in which we are innocent until proven guilty.”

    With all due respect, I must call you and others out on this one. It is wrong in our constitutional republic to say that a person is “innocent until proven guilty”. To do so implies that they are in fact guilty, and we only assume innocence “until” this guilt is proven. It is instead correct to say that a person is “innocent UNLESS proven guilty”. This maintains the presumption of innocence throughout due process without implying that we only hold that innocence “until” the guilt is proven.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to resolute Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.