Apparently Nancy – and the staffer who wrote this – doesn’t understand our justice system, in which we are innocent until proven guilty.
Watch:
Support Stella’s Place
Prayer Requests
Recent Comments
Lucille on It’s Doggityday! Lucille on It’s Doggityday! Lucille on General Discussion, Wednesday,… Lucille on General Discussion, Wednesday,… Pa Hermit on D-Day. June 6, 1944 Stella on General Discussion, Tuesday, J… auscitizenmom on General Discussion, Tuesday, J… Stella on D-Day. June 6, 1944 texan59 on Flamers! Lucille on Flamers! Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, J… Stella on General Discussion, Tuesday, J… Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, J… weather257 on General Discussion, Tuesday, J… czarina33 on General Discussion, Tuesday, J…
Stella's Place 
Her arrogance and ignorance never cease to amaze me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Is Faux news biased much??? There is very little room here to play devils’ advocate! The hag Pelosi has been around since the early 60’s I recall a pic of here and JFK. After 6 decades she is still as useless as that proverbial hind teat on a boar hog!
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the system of justice she believes in, people ARE NOT presumed to be innocent but instead are presumed to be guilty. It’s perfectly fine with her that her political enemies are indicted simply because they won’t cease trying to maintain America as a Constitutional Republic. She’d be perfectly OK with a dictatorship as long as her vision is followed…indeed, that is what she has supported for many years.
LikeLike
“In the system of justice she believes in, people ARE NOT presumed to be innocent but instead are presumed to be guilty…”
…..unless her husband is involved.
LikeLiked by 2 people
One night I talk about how patient we and Trump must be, then you put something like this up here and I just want to go throat-p*nch her. Breathe deep………breathe deep……………..
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Apparently Nancy – and the staffer who wrote this – doesn’t understand our justice system, in which we are innocent until proven guilty.”
With all due respect, I must call you and others out on this one. It is wrong in our constitutional republic to say that a person is “innocent until proven guilty”. To do so implies that they are in fact guilty, and we only assume innocence “until” this guilt is proven. It is instead correct to say that a person is “innocent UNLESS proven guilty”. This maintains the presumption of innocence throughout due process without implying that we only hold that innocence “until” the guilt is proven.
LikeLiked by 1 person