The Truth about Hillary’s emails? Depends on what the definition of “were” was

Just like Bill Clinton’s definition of “is”.  I don’t know if you saw it this week, but Hillary proclaimed on Twitter: “the fact is that I had zero emails that were classified.”

Jonathan Turley explains:

The Post declared Clinton “technically correct” in the claim, which left out that she was substantively wrong. While the Post elects not to award any “Pinocchios,” Clinton’s statement is clearly false and even the Post appears to recognize that fact at the very end of its analysis.  Indeed, “technical” truth is wonderfully Clintonesque — captured in Bill’s infamous defense during the Monica Lewinsky investigation that “it depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” The email scandal now depends on what the meaning of “were” was.  Hillary Clinton is focusing on whether the emails were marked classified as opposed to whether they contained classified information.

I previously wrote about Hillary’s claim and argued that it was demonstrably false. While I focused on her claim that there is an unfair “Clinton standard” that applies to her, I noted how Clinton is making a signature technical claim regarding classified markings rather than classified content.The tortured logic is transparently and knowingly misleading.

[. . .] Clinton is now rewriting history with the help of many in the media who simultaneously pushed this line that the email scandal was a type of conservative hoax. It was not.

[. . .] It is only at the very end, that the Post again acknowledges this point in affirming a “technical” truth in favor of Clinton:

“Clinton, in her tweet, suggests none of her emails were marked classified. That’s technically correct. Whether those emails contained classified information was a major focus of the investigation, but a review of the recent investigations, including new information obtained by the Fact Checker, shows Clinton has good reason for making a distinction with Trump.”

Unpack this line. The column admits that it was not the markings but the content that was a “major focus of the investigation,” but then declared Clinton “technically correct.”

[. . .] Moreover, the thousands of emails cited by Hillary do not include thousands destroyed by her staff. In 2014, Clinton and her staff were aware that these emails were being sought by both congressional and federal investigators. However, they used BleachBit to wipe out thousands of emails and then told investigators that they made the unilateral decision that such emails were “personal.”

The Clintons have long thrived in the gray area between “technical” and actual truth. From Hillary’s claim to being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to Bill Clinton parsing of the word “is.” Yet, that ability to shape truth to their immediate needs is only possible with assistance of an endlessly enabling media.

This entry was posted in 2022 Election, 2024 Presidential Race, Fake News, government corruption, Media. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Truth about Hillary’s emails? Depends on what the definition of “were” was

  1. auscitizenmom says:

    She is just a big liar.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Pa Hermit says:

    Hillary and Bill should be public enemy #1 if Trump gains POTUS status again! No more Mr. Nice Guy!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Lucille says:

    To be able to lie with such a straight face and without any degree of embarrassment shows a personality disorder of high proportion. Like so many leftist women and their enablers, Hillary always plays the victim.

    I sincerely appreciate a classical liberal like Turley looking at the Left with clear eyes. It’s likely he’s lost many friends and the respect of some colleagues. Most folks in his situation wouldn’t have chosen honor over expediency. That he chose to keep his honor is why I admire him and his quietly-expressed opinions and knowledge of the law.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.