Peggy Noonan’s Take On the 2016 Republican field

donald_trump_2016_presidential

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peggy’s assessment is pretty much on target.

From the Wall Street Journal:

…. The distance between the top of the party and the bottom has been growing for years, at least since 2008. The bonds between the two have stretched and stretched, and this year they began to snap. That’s the story of the year, that the snapping became obvious. Mr. Trump and the Trumps of the future are the result, not the cause. The establishment does not see this. They think it’s about him. It’s about them ….

When Mr. Trump announced in June, I knew he’d hit a powerful nerve but did not see him lasting as long as he has. He was a product of voter anger, contempt and lowering standards: “We’re entering Weimar, baby.” In time I saw his power. In August I noted: “The traditional mediating or guiding institutions within the Republican universe—its establishment, respected voices in conservative media, sober-minded state party officials—have little to no impact on Mr. Trump’s rise. Some say voices of authority should stand up to oppose him, which will lower his standing. But Republican powers don’t have that kind of juice anymore.” Traveling around the country, “my biggest sense is that political professionals are going to have to rethink ‘the base,’ reimagine it when they see it in their minds. . . . America is so in play,” and the base is “becoming a big, broad jumble that few understand.”

I asserted his appeal was not limited to Republicans. My highly scientific reason is that in talking to Trump supporters it often emerged that they were Democrats or independents.

Happy New Year; let’s get through it together.

Reading the rest is well worth your time.

donald_trump_the_president_we_deserve

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Peggy Noonan’s Take On the 2016 Republican field

  1. Menagerie's avatar Menagerie says:

    There is no voice left in The Republican Party that carries any weight or influence for me. Unless Ronald Reagan speaks to me directly from the other side, I’m not even listening.

    Seriously, they can’t reach me because they have no credibility. I am not reading what they have to say. I am not listening to what they have to say. I won’t open their mail, I don’t answer their phone calls.

    And here’s the point. I am not alone. There are millions of me.

    I do want to sent the Republicans a message though. KMA.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. Col.(R) Ken's avatar Col.(R) Ken says:

    Yes, well said, and may I add this the establishment said the same about Reagan in ’79.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. lovely's avatar lovely says:

    I asserted his appeal was not limited to Republicans. My highly scientific reason is that in talking to Trump supporters it often emerged that they were Democrats or independents.

    https://twitter.com/BlueThunder808/status/683041022264258560

    Liked by 1 person

  4. texan59's avatar texan59 says:

    “My highly scientific reason”. An incorrect thesis is not made correct by an improper methodology. But she still gets airtime and pixels just like King Karl. None of these “smart” people are gonna understand this……..ever. 🙄

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a reply to texan59 Cancel reply