He speaks truth. Europeans are not pleased.
He speaks truth. Europeans are not pleased.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


| Lucille on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| Lucille on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| auscitizenmom on Story of the day – The G… | |
| auscitizenmom on It’s Caturday! | |
| auscitizenmom on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| texan59 on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| Stella on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| texan59 on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| texan59 on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| czarina33 on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| czarina33 on General Discussion, Saturday,… |

US Vice President JD Vance has used his speech at the Munich Security Conference to criticize what he called the “retreat” of free speech across Europe. “The threat that I worry most about, vis-a-vis Europe, is not Russia, it’s not China, it’s not any other external actor,” Vance said. “What I worry about is the threat from within: the retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values — values shared with the United States of America.”
“Across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat,” he added. “Under Donald Trump’s leadership, we may disagree with your views, but we will defend your right to offer it in the public square — agree or disagree.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
I saw about two minutes of this and it was spectacular. Looks like JD is playing the bad cop right now in the good cop/bad cop play. It’s so refreshing to actually understand what one of our leaders is saying. We had none of this during the last four years. Whether you agreed with them or not, there was absolutely no depth to any public speech from that administration.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A great speech, and well delivered.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Then there’s Canada, where our Prime Dictator was pushing a bill that would allow people to be convicted of crimes not yet committed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How does that even work?
LikeLiked by 2 people
By criminalizing “hate” speech on social media.
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/liberals-harmful-online-content
LikeLiked by 2 people
Some real delicate flowers up there, eh?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Some, yest, but most Canadians are against it. It’s yet another of our Prime Dictator’s ways of getting completely control of our lives.
And we just can’t get rid of him. He’s like a bad rash. At this point, I’m starting to thing Trump annexing Canada will be the only thing that can save us.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Off the topic, but your essay for today. “Is this love?”, is well worth the reading.
Thank you.
LikeLike
Thank you!
LikeLike
https://www.jccf.ca/online-harms-act-threatens-free-expression-in-canada/
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Pre-emptive punishment for crimes not committed
The Online Harms Act, if passed into law, will add section 810.012 to the Criminal Code, which will permit pre-emptive violations of personal liberty when no crime has been committed. This repudiates centuries of legal tradition that rightly reserved punishment for what a person had done, not for what a person might do. Under this new provision, a complainant can assert to a provincial court that they “fear” that someone will promote genocide, hate or antisemitism. If the judge believes that there are “reasonable grounds” to justify the fear, the court can violate the liberty interests of the accused citizen by requiring her or him to do any or all of the following:
wear an ankle bracelet (electronic monitoring device)
obey a curfew and stay at home, as determined by the judge
abstain from alcohol, drugs, or both
provide bodily substances (e.g. blood, urine) to confirm abstinence from drugs or alcohol
not communicate with certain designated persons
not go to certain places, as determined by the judge
surrender her or his legally owned and legally acquired firearms
In other words: a citizen who has not committed any crime can be subjected to one or more (or all) of the above conditions just because someone fears that that person might commit a speech crime in future. Further, if the person who has committed no crime fails to agree to these court-ordered violations of her or his personal liberty, she or he could be sentenced to up to two years in prison.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Re-Farmer,
What madness this is in a new cloak.
Pre-emptive wars mean never ending wars.
Pre-emptive pardons means crimes never to be punished.
While pre-emptive punishment will exist for crimes never committed.
It’s the Queen of Hearts as Minister of Justice in Wonderland.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup. That’s our current government!
LikeLike