Donald Trump: Why I’m Suing Big Tech

Yesterday this Op-Ed by President Trump was published in the The Wall Street Journal:

One of the gravest threats to our democracy today is a powerful group of Big Tech corporations that have teamed up with government to censor the free speech of the American people. This is not only wrong—it is unconstitutional. To restore free speech for myself and for every American, I am suing Big Tech to stop it.

Social media has become as central to free speech as town meeting halls, newspapers and television networks were in prior generations. The internet is the new public square. In recent years, however, Big Tech platforms have become increasingly brazen and shameless in censoring and discriminating against ideas, information and people on social media—banning users, deplatforming organizations, and aggressively blocking the free flow of information on which our democracy depends.

No longer are Big Tech giants simply removing specific threats of violence. They are manipulating and controlling the political debate itself. Consider content that was censored in the past year. Big Tech companies banned users from their platforms for publishing evidence that showed the coronavirus emerged from a Chinese lab, which even the corporate media now admits may be true. In the middle of a pandemic, Big Tech censored physicians from discussing potential treatments such as hydroxychloroquine, which studies have now shown does work to relieve symptoms of Covid-19. In the weeks before a presidential election, the platforms banned the New York Post—America’s oldest newspaper—for publishing a story critical of Joe Biden’s family, a story the Biden campaign did not even dispute.

Perhaps most egregious, in the weeks after the election, Big Tech blocked the social-media accounts of the sitting president. If they can do it to me, they can do it to you—and believe me, they are.

Jennifer Horton, a Michigan schoolteacher, was banned from Facebook for sharing an article questioning whether mandatory masks for young children are healthy. Later, when her brother went missing, she was unable to use Facebook to get the word out. Colorado physician Kelly Victory was deplatformed by YouTube after she made a video for her church explaining how to hold services safely. Kiyan Michael of Florida and her husband, Bobby, lost their 21-year-old son in a fatal collision caused by a twice-deported illegal alien. Facebook censored them after they posted on border security and immigration enforcement.

Meanwhile, Chinese propagandists and the Iranian dictator spew threats and hateful lies on these platforms with impunity.

This flagrant attack on free speech is doing terrible damage to our country. That is why in conjunction with the America First Policy Institute, I filed class-action lawsuits to force Big Tech to stop censoring the American people. The suits seek damages to deter such behavior in the future and injunctions restoring my accounts.

Our lawsuits argue that Big Tech companies are being used to impose illegal and unconstitutional government censorship. In 1996 Congress sought to promote the growth of the internet by extending liability protections to internet platforms, recognizing that they were exactly that—platforms, not publishers. Unlike publishers, companies such as Facebook and Twitter can’t be held legally liable for the content posted to their sites. Without this immunity, social media companies could not exist.

Democrats in Congress are exploiting this leverage to coerce platforms into censoring their political opponents. In recent years, we have all watched Congress haul Big Tech CEOs before their committees and demand that they censor “false” stories and “disinformation”—labels determined by an army of partisan fact-checkers loyal to the Democrat Party. As the cases of fellow plaintiffs Ms. Horton, Dr. Victory and the Michael family demonstrate, in practice this amounts to suppression of speech that those in power do not like.

Further, Big Tech and government agencies are actively coordinating to remove content from the platforms according to the guidance of agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Big Tech and traditional media entities formed the Trusted News Initiative, which essentially takes instructions from the CDC about what information they need to “combat.” The tech companies are doing the government’s bidding, colluding to censor unapproved ideas.

This coercion and coordination is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has held that Congress can’t use private actors to achieve what the Constitution prohibits it from doing itself. In effect, Big Tech has been illegally deputized as the censorship arm of the U.S. government. This should alarm you no matter your political persuasion. It is unacceptable, unlawful and un-American.

Through these lawsuits, I intend to restore free speech for all Americans—Democrats, Republicans and independents. I will never stop fighting to defend the constitutional rights and sacred liberties of the American people.

I don’t know whether or not this lawsuit will succeed. Some in the legal world think it might, and others (while they wish that it would) believe that it will not. Most (including Alan Dershowitz) think that it is consequential. He is an expert witness in this case.

This entry was posted in Censorship, Free Speech, Law, MAGA, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Donald Trump: Why I’m Suing Big Tech

  1. texan59 says:

    My fear is that this exercise in freedom will get the same treatment his voting challenges did. Not many judges want their fingerprints on anything Trump, as they fear for their safety. Of which there will be none very soon if they don’t take it on, paradoxically.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. jeans2nd says:

    Stella, have you listened to Viva Frei’s vlawg on this one? It is titled “Is Trump’s “State Actor” Twitter Lawsuit a LOSER? Viva Frei Vlawg” from 8 Jul 2021.
    It is rather amusing. As a Canadian, Frei has no idea the tenacity of some Americans to achieve their purposes. Frei suspected the lawsuit was put together recently in a couple weeks iirc.

    Worse yet, Eric Hunely pooled 3 American attorneys plus VF for a confab yesterday, and the three Americans, obviously none of whom being students of history, all said this suit stood no chance. One guy even said the law firm did not advertise as a class action firm so this may be their first case.

    Was laughing so hard by this time I had to stop listening.
    The Viva-Barnes Law LiveStream tomorrow night ought to be a rollicking good time.
    One suspects Barnes’ memory will be a mite more accurate. Then again, who knows?

    This is Bannon and rather lengthy – 11 minutes – but this is highly recommended for knowledge –

    Bannon interview with John Coale
    “Big Tech Answered To Threats” 11:22 (Rumble link)

    You will hear some of Attorney Coale’s reasoning and, at the end, how long Attorney Coale has been working this in his head – a couple years.

    They always underestimate the quiet ones (who are 😉 usually the most dangerous).

    (this is long, so see ya in the trash bin! lol)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.