Today’s tweet choice – Profit is usually the motive

Saw this tweet today and I think it is worth reminding everyone that Warren Buffett truly benefits from cancellation of the pipeline from Canada.

Warren Buffett owns the railroad that transports the oil. When these pipelines are completed, he loses the business. It is as simple as that. An American Thinker article from 2015 explains:

As Investor’s Business Daily noted in a 2011 editorial:

Killing the Keystone XL pipeline may help one of the world’s richest men get richer. North Dakota’s booming oil fields will now grow more dependent on a railroad the president’s economic guru just bought….

As oil production ramps up in the Bakken fields of North Dakota, plans to use the pipeline to transport it have been dashed.

As a result, North Dakota’s booming oil producers will have to rely even more on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad, which Buffett just bought, to ship it to refineries.

Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has agreed to buy Burlington Northern Santa Fe in a deal valuing the railroad at $34 billion. Berkshire Hathaway already owns about 22% of Burlington Northern, and will pay $100 a share in cash and stock for the rest of the company.

It isn’t a matter of pipelines being an environment hazard or less safe than other methods of transport. It is quite the contrary, as outlined by Forbes in 2018:

While many have called for shutdown of pipelines and a moratorium on new pipeline construction, the correct reaction may just be the opposite. We really should be replacing old pipelines and building new ones, reducing the stress on each line. Particularly good is to supersize them – build bigger pipelines over old ones.

The problem is that oil production is increasing but it can’t get to the refineries along our Gulf Coast. Since there are only four ways to move oil and gas around the country – pipeline, truck, rail and boat – you have to pick one or another of these. If you don’t build new pipelines, then more will probably move by rail, especially from Canada.

In the U.S., 100% of our natural gas is shipped by pipeline. 70% of crude oil and petroleum products are shipped by pipeline. 23% of oil shipments are on tankers and barges over water. Trucking only accounts for 4% of shipments, and rail for a mere 3%. In Canada, it’s even more lopsided. Almost all (97%) of natural gas and petroleum products are transported by pipelines…

So which mode is safer? For oil, the short answer is: truck worse than train worse than pipeline worse than boat ( But that’s only for human death and property destruction. For the amount of oil spilled per billion-ton-miles, it’s truck worse than pipeline worse than rail worse than boat (Congressional Research Service). Even more different is for environmental impact (dominated by impact to aquatic habitat), where it’s boat worse than pipeline worse than truck worse than rail.

It depends upon what your definition is for worse. Is it deaths and destruction? Is it amount of oil released? Is it land area or water volume contaminated? Is it habitat destroyed? Is it CO2 emitted?

Amid a North American energy boom and a lack of pipeline capacity, crude oil shipping on rail has been steadily increasing. The trains are getting bigger and towing more and more tanker cars. From 1975 to 2012, trains were shorter and spills were rare and small, with about half of those years having no spills above a few gallons. Then came 2013, in which more crude oil was spilled in U.S. rail incidents than was spilled in the previous thirty-seven years…

Like always, it will probably come down to money. And it won’t be about jobs, regardless of which end of the spectrum you believe, because there just isn’t enough jobs to matter compared to the value of the oil itself and the refinery capacity and locations. It’s simply cheaper and quicker to transport by pipeline than by rail or by truck. The difference in cost is about $50 billion a year for shipping via the Keystone versus rail, totally eclipsing any economic effect of jobs in either direction.

He’s right that the decision hasn’t been about jobs, but those jobs are important to the men and women who are losing them and having a tough time supporting their families.

The really sad thing is that the pipeline is the right way to go. As long as we continue to use petroleum products, which will be decades at the earliest, we aren’t going to stop transporting crude oil to refineries, so it is should be a matter of choosing the best way to transport that oil, and that is pipelines.

This entry was posted in Corruption, Economy, Government, Politics, Social Media. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Today’s tweet choice – Profit is usually the motive

  1. auscitizenmom says:

    Well, at least that is something that makes sense. Nothing else does. :\

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Pa Hermit says:

    Exploration I thought was toast too. So just shipping is involved? This reminds of the “cable” issue. Don’t like what your cable company is operating? What’s the options? No cable at all or satellite? Nice choices, no?

    Liked by 1 person

    • stella says:

      The only thing affecting exploration in the USA is a ban on more oil leases on Federal land. That will probably happen too. This is just about Biden canceling the permit for building the Keystone XL pipeline.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. jeans2nd says:

    Warren Buffett was my first thought when Joebama announced Keystone’s ultimate demise. Funny how all that works for the betterment of Our Betters and not the serfs.
    Pipelines are actually more safe than most know, but no one is reporting on advancing technology for the pipelines.

    Around 2016 iirc, at where my memory says Ohio State but that is prob incorrect, pipelines started using robotics. There are little tiny robots who continuously travel up and down the pipelines looking for probs or potential probs in the pipelines, and continuously report on the robot’s findings.

    The kicker is, the little tiny robots are inside the pipelines. Pretty cool, huh? Robotics doing things a human never could, making human habitats and the environment much more safe.

    But for the party of Muh Science, no such advancement exists. Back to the dungeon, serfs.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Gary says:

    History never repeats itself, only human nature does.

    Oil being transported by rail / prompting pipeline construction = Vanderbilt /Rockefeller with the only difference being the pipeline not solely owned by an individual.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.