Apparently they attached explosives to at least one of the ships while it was in port.
Apparently they attached explosives to at least one of the ships while it was in port.


| Stella on What is “Unconditional S… | |
| Stella on What is “Unconditional S… | |
| Stella on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| Stella on What is “Unconditional S… | |
| Re-Farmer on What is “Unconditional S… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| texan59 on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| auscitizenmom on What is “Unconditional S… | |
| auscitizenmom on What is “Unconditional S… | |
| auscitizenmom on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| Stella on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| czarina33 on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… | |
| czarina33 on General Discussion, Monday, Ma… |
Limpets, same thing they did to the tankers in UAE waters on the 12th of May.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks. I couldn’t remember what they were called and, obviously, the Fox guy didn’t know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The mine makes the light damage obvious. The workhorse Iranian torpedo carries an almost 500-pound warhead and would have broken the tanker in two.
I’d mentioned the limpets that had been attached to the two Saudi tankers exactly a month ago but I got hung up on the mainline torpedo talk and spent too much time trying to figure out how that would work.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Got ’em to rights.
LikeLiked by 2 people