The following was posted by Clarice Feldman on Facebook. I added paragraph breaks for easier reading, and added an image of Christine Blasey-Ford’s handwritten statement. This statement was prepared by her just before her polygraph examination, at the request of the examiner.email from a former colleague:
Many years ago while employed at OSI, I took a course given by an Israeli psychologist, who was in my opinion, funded by the Mossad. He was absolutely brilliant. I have the certificate buried somewhere in my basement if you need his name. He developed something called “Statement Analysis”, which is widely used for “hands off” interrogation by many law enforcement agencies. All of the other attendees were government types from FBI, CIA, etc.
“Statement Analysis” is based on the hypothesis that “everybody wants to tell everybody about everything”. It picks apart grammatically an individual’s statement for inconsistencies, looking especially at pronoun usage (I, me, she, he, we, they, etc.) and for any omissions in facts or for missing time in the time line established by the witnesses’ statement.
Many years after I left OSI while working as an Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney, I used Statement Analysis to exonerate a falsely accused rapist, much to the chagrin of his accuser. A recently married woman had her ex-boy friend over for one last fling but was discovered by some neighborhood children. To protect herself, she made a complaint to the Manassas Park Police that he had “raped” her.
The officer assigned to the case, Bob Mosier, is currently the Sherriff of Faquier County, Va. Bob smelled a rat and knew I had taken the “Mossad” inspired course. I met with the accuser and had her make a handwritten statement, similar to the one submitted by Dr. Ford during her pre-polygraph interview. Making the witness write it out in their own hand makes them “own” the statement. Before the statement is written, the interviewer tells the witness to be sure to include everything that happened, and after the statement is written, the interviewer again asks the witness if everything that happened is in the statement. In my case, in Manassas Park, the accuser wrote out the statement, but nowhere in the statement was the fact that the sex was “AGAINST HER WILL”.
When I confronted her with this glaring omission, she admitted the rape allegation was false and she did it to protect herself from discovery in her tryst. Her ex-boy friend had called her up and asked for one last fling, the payment for which was that he would return some compromising photos of the accuser he had taken during their relationship. So he was a cad of the first order, but not a rapist. It was a case of “prostitution” gone bad. He never gave up the photos to her but turned them over to the police.
The point of this antidote is, when examining Dr. Ford’s handwritten statement, there is absolutely no mention by Dr. Ford that any of the complained of behavior by Kavanaugh was AGAINST HER WILL. Even if her statement is completely true, there is no evidence that she wasn’t receptive to the boys’ drunken behavior.
Further, there are significant gaps in time in the statement that indicate deception. She didn’t state how she arrived, how she departed and what happened before, “At one point, I went up a small stairwell to use the restroom.” What happened before she went up the stairs? There is missing time between when she arrived at the party and when she went up the stairs. This indicates, according to my training, that she is hiding something. Perhaps that she was drinking excessively which would impair her memory, or that she was invited upstairs and she went willingly. Who knows?
One thing is certain, “Statement Analysis” has been widely taught in this country and if asked, the retired FBI polygrapher will admit why he made her give the hand written statement, and probably would also admit that he admonished Dr. Ford to write a “complete statement” leaving nothing out about the incident. If he didn’t admonish her, he would have been remiss in his examination and would thereby call into question its results.I don’t know if it is significant, but did you notice that she signed her name as “Christine Blasey”, not Christine Ford or Christine Blasey-Ford?