At 7pm Eastern, we will begin a 1 hour pre-announcement special followed by LIVE, uninterrupted coverage of the Supreme Court Announcement beginning at 8pm Eastern and a post-announcement, “Interactive Chat” beginning immediately after the event.
At 7pm Eastern, we will begin a 1 hour pre-announcement special followed by LIVE, uninterrupted coverage of the Supreme Court Announcement beginning at 8pm Eastern and a post-announcement, “Interactive Chat” beginning immediately after the event.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


| texan59 on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| texan59 on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| Lucille on It’s Caturday! | |
| Lucille on It’s Caturday! | |
| Lucille on General Discussion, Saturday,… | |
| auscitizenmom on General Discussion, Friday, Ja… | |
| auscitizenmom on General Discussion, Friday, Ja… | |
| Sharon on “Prepare for the Worst… | |
| Sharon on “Prepare for the Worst… | |
| WeeWeed on “Prepare for the Worst… | |
| Stella on General Discussion, Friday, Ja… | |
| Stella on General Discussion, Friday, Ja… | |
| Stella on “Prepare for the Worst… | |
| auscitizenmom on WEF Attendees – Who are… | |
| WeeWeed on General Discussion, Friday, Ja… |
Very exciting! I’m glued to Lou Dobbs right now waiting for the news.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Here we go!
LikeLiked by 2 people
He’s an impressive man.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ahhhh! Our president!!!! ššš
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neil Gorsuch!
LikeLiked by 3 people
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/get-to-know-supreme-court-short-lister-neil-gorsuch/article/2612877
LikeLiked by 2 people
Via Drudge right now:
LikeLiked by 1 person
“That Judge Gorsuchās judicial philosophy is similar to Justice Scaliaās is evident from a tribute the former gave after the latterās death. In that tribute, Gorsuch summarized and endorsed Scaliaās method of legal interpretation:”
āJudges should instead strive (if humanly and so imperfectly) to apply the law as it is, focusing backward, not forward, and looking to text, structure, and history to decide what a reasonable reader at the time of the events in question would have understood the law to be ā not to decide cases based on their own moral convictions or the policy consequences they believe might serve society best. As Justice Scalia put it, āif youāre going to be a good and faithful judge, you have to resign yourself to the fact that youāre not always going to like the conclusions you reach. If you like them all the time, youāre probably doing something wrong.ā
LikeLiked by 3 people