From Donald Trump’s Reddit page, Cross post from r/DNCleaks…:

DNC CHANGES THE DATE ON CONTRIBUTIONS!…SUBVERSION OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/21847

(LINK ABOVE) Discussing a 2016 event:

Kristin White: Bennett Murphy gave $33,400 to our 2/11 event (CA472a) but the NFC List 2016 has him down for giving $30,900 this year. Would you mind poking around/updating?

Daniel Parrish: So it looks like he gave $33,400 but since it was a Hope event and he hadn’t maxed out in 2012, $2500 went to the debt. I can add that back in on top of his 2015 total. Does that work for you?

Lindsay Rachelefsky: Yes thank you!

---

Hey, that would put it in a different reporting period! But there may be something a lot worse here:

Here’s how I think it works.

Someone doesn’t give a max donation one year, for example 2012. The difference between what they actually donated and the maximum personal contribution allowed that year is recorded as “debt.” So this guy “owes” them $2,500.

He then gives $33,400 in 2016, but they take out $2,500 to apply to the “debt” from 2012 and retroactively add that contribution to a year in which he didn’t max out. This frees him up for another $2,500 in the current year.

Depending on how corrupt they are, they could be free to collect all the “debt” from multiple previous years. This could be tens of millions of dollars they have effectively raised their total maximum fund raising by for this election.

Someone who is in “debt” for not donating for the past 3 years could get in 4 times the maximum donation for this year, the very important election year.

Ex – DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s spread sheet (“the big spreadsheet of all things” excel file wikileaks download link), the source of these figures (under the DEBT tab), with the two different $ columns covers the years 2013, 14, 15. We can assume many Democrats maxed out for the 2012 presidential election, but they would have “debt” from the less important years they may not have given as much that could be taken advantage of now.

Changes to contribution law, hidden within the 2014 spending bill, allow the DNC and RNC to take in large checks, then break them up, and distribute them between 4 funds as they see fit.

It is unknown who put this change into the spending bill. According to a certain media company, founded by someone who hosts major fundraisers for both the DNC and DWS, it totally wasn’t her, according to un-named sources. (Ken Lerer, HuffPo)

This breaking up of the check is the point when the funds are free to be moved around, ostensibly to the 4 DNC funds. A crooked politician, however, could take advantage of this point in time when the money is no longer tied to the information from the contributor, like what fund it was written out to or even what date it was from.

Rather than go into specialty funds, the money could go to the general fund, marked as coming in from a previous year – or go into entirely different funds like Hillary’s, or a fund that is used to move money around.

The national party can make unlimited transfer of funds to or from the state, local, and candidate committees. We know there was are claims about money not ending up where it should have when it came to the DNC and state parties with the HFV (confirmed by multiple members of the DNC in the leaks already)… Unlimited transactions provides an opening for software designed for large numbers of rapid speed transactions to send the money back and forth and all over the place many, many times. This would not erase the paper trail, but make it a mile long and difficult to follow. Fraudulently editing the amounts a little bit at a time could also be used and be very difficult to track.

More at: http://tinyurl.com/hy329jx