Amid the discord ignited by Donald Trump’s idea to block money transfers to Mexico until it funds a wall it’s important to note that a U.S. government program is largely responsible for the billions in remittances flowing south of the border from illegal immigrants.
The program is called “Directo a Mexico” (Direct to Mexico) and the Federal Reserve, the government agency that serves as the nation’s central bank, launched it nearly a decade ago. Judicial Watch investigated the outrageous taxpayer-subsidized initiative and obtained government records back in 2006. It was created by President George W. Bush following the 2001 U.S.-Mexico Partnership for Prosperity, undermines our nation’s immigration laws and is a potential national security nightmare. The goal was to provide low-cost banking services to illegal immigrants and facilitate the process for those sending money home. Remittances are transferred through the Federal Reserve’s own automated clearinghouse linked directly to Mexico’s central bank (Banco de Mexico).
At the time Federal Reserve officials acknowledged that most of the Mexicans who send money home are illegal immigrants so a Mexican-issued identification is the only requirement to use the government banking service. A colorful brochure promoting “Directo a Mexico” offered to help immigrants who don’t have bank accounts and assured the best foreign exchange rate and low transfer fees. A frequently asked question section posed this: “If I return to Mexico or am deported, will I lose the money in my bank account?” The answer: “No. The money still belongs to you and can easily be accessed at an ATM in Mexico using your debit card.” In short, the U.S. created this special banking system specifically for illegal aliens and tens of billions of dollars have flowed through it, according to figures obtained by JW from Banco de Mexico.
From the 2006 report from Judicial Watch:
While the federal government is subsidizing and marketing “Directo a México”, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard has seized millions of dollars en route to Mexico via Western Union, the largest U.S. money-transfer company. These financial transactions are allegedly linked to a sophisticated drug smuggling and human trafficking racket. Arizona courts have issued warrants that allow state investigators to intercept wire transfers that exceed $500 from 23 states.
“The taxpayer-subsidized ‘Directo a México’ program seems designed to facilitate the transfer of wealth by illegal immigrants outside the United States. This program undermines our nation’s immigration laws and is a potential national security nightmare,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “In the least, the Federal Reserve must limit this program to legal aliens and U.S. citizens only.”
Our government, rather than controlling illegal immigration, is catering to businesses who want to hire cheap labor, regardless of immigration status, and it is an irresistible attraction to the flow of illegals that are willing to work for substandard wages. After all, although substandard by U.S. standards, the wages are many times higher than what they can earn in Mexico. Created during the Bush administration, it is just another indication that our elected officials – regardless of political party – are not on the side of the American worker.
The low wages of the illegals and the billions they send home also put a tremendous burden on social services in the United States, while taking entry level jobs out of the reach of American citizens.
Information from The Federal Reserve Bank:
Click to access DirectoMexicoFAQ.pdf
.
Judicial Watch:


Banks are and always have been in the ‘questionable money transfer’ business. First time I bumped into it was in the 70s where I received a taste of how drug dealers of al sizes move cash. It was far easier for them to move illegal cash around then and where it got harder in the 80s and 90s they had a hand in crafting the legislation that was supposed to control tbem soooooo.
Whether it’s drug profits, illegal alien earnings or your paycheck means zip to the banks as long as they havevthe teeniest sliver of plausable deniability. Even then they employ well-paid lawyers who are generally better at their jobs than their Fedeal counterparts-after all, why would you work for the Feds if one of the businesses you’re suposed to be birddogging would pay you two, three or more times that to work for them? Oh yeah, I forgot, ‘principles’ , yeah, poverty ubercalles.
The money-by-wire transfer companies had a leg up on the illegals sending money home and the banks jumped in big-time when the amounts being transferred started to become a significant part of the Mexican gross national product. The banks smell profits and a little thing like laws won’t stop them from doing business, especially since in the unlikely event they get caught the punishment will be a slap on the wrist. Remember a short time back when ING was caught illegaly doing money deals with Iran valued in the billions of dollars? ING was fined $619-million for that, and how much of their total yearly profits that was?
Forget trying to reform the banking business, they own too many pols – hey, our sitting Ba’athist POtuS even heaved our cash at them to save their crooked butts. It’s illegal for us to rob banks but not for them to rob us, it’s just what it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t expect better of the banks. I did expect better of our elected representatives. Like George W. Bush. How naive of me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What do you think attracts politicians more, a banker with hands full of money or you with your heart full of hopes? Gotta remember that those pols spend more time ‘fund raising’ than they do meeting the needs of the electorate, a fact they admit to albeit with excuses.
The nightly news talks about illegal drugs, terrorists/guerillas and money all being interconnected but they forget to mention that the money is what facilitates it all and someobe has to handle that money. Perhaps because secthe banks manage that money and they may need the services of those banks someday.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We can always hope for some honest politicians. I refuse to lose hope. In any event, people should be informed about these matters and if I can be of some help in that regard, then I will be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just like I faithfully play the lottery each week, never can tell if you’ll win and I hope I do
LikeLiked by 1 person