Rush Limbaugh: Trump Refuses to Play by the Rules

Rush-Limbaugh

Lots of talk lately about Rush and the 2016 Presidential race. Does he favor Trump? Does he favor Cruz? Is he subtly pushing one candidate or the other? Why doesn’t he endorse Trump? Or Cruz?

For background to this commentary that appeared on his radio show yesterday, he first said this:

Preamble to Today’s Analysis: I Have Friends on All Sides of This Campaign

You know, I’ve been thinking about something since last night. I saw Rudy Giuliani on Megyn Kelly’s show on Fox last night and he was going on about how he is friendly with so many people involved in all this. He’s friends here, friends there, talked about the Republican nomination and then the various candidates. He said, “I know so many of them. They’re close friends.”

And it got me to thinking. He’s exactly right. It makes this challenging. I get all kinds of criticism, which is fine, but some of it, “You know, Rush, I don’t know, you gotta know some of these people. How do we know that you don’t secretly prefer one over the other and you’re not being up front and honest about it because you know these people?” And I can understand people with that sentiment.

I’ll say this – my opinion is that Rush has always been open and honest about his friendships with politicians, business people, and others in media. I notice that he didn’t mention Beck, Hannity, or Levin.  That’s odd, and piques my curiosity.

Now, on to the Main Course. Trump Refuses to Play by the Rules:

First, he sets the scene:

RUSH: Okay, where are we on the situation here with Trump and the debate?  So far Trump says he’s not showing up.  He claims he’s not showing up because Megyn Kelly is going to continue to be a moderator.  And if you believe that, I can give you substantive reasons.  And it’s all in The Art of the Deal.  Trump is not that hard to understand if you pay attention to him and read his books.  In The Art of the Deal, one of the things that he makes a huge deal about is being able to know when to walk away and have the guts and the courage to do it.

Trump is so far outside the formula that has been established for American politics that people who are inside the formula can’t comprehend it.  They don’t understand why somebody would want to venture so far outside it, because it is what it is, and there’s a ladder of success that you have to climb.  And somebody challenging it like this in more ways than one, as Trump is doing, has just got everybody experiencing every kind of emotion you can:  They’re angry, they are flabbergasted, they’re shocked, they’re stunned —  and all of it because he’s leading.

151211-trump-rally-iowa-1025p_6df9dcae6a92836b590efe27a9f36b94.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000

The elitists:

Like any group of elites, they’re exclusionary.

They want to keep people out.

They want to be in charge of who gets in the club. They want to be in charge of who’s allowed to rise or climb the ladder in the club.  Politics is no different, and all of those determinations are made by who gets money and who doesn’t.  But Trump is functioning totally outside this structure that has existed for decades.  As such, the people who are only familiar with the structure and believe in it and cherish it and want to protect it, feel threatened in ways that you can’t even comprehend.  So that leads them to try to figure out: How is all this working for Trump?  Why do his followers grow? Why does his support expand every time he busts a rule wide open?

 

reince-priebus

The media:

And in this business one of the games is that when the media calls, you answer, and when the media wants you, you go, and when the media is going to host a debate and it’s part of a Republican presidential campaign, you go.  You just do it, no matter what the media’s done to you in the past, no matter what you think of it, whether you want to go or not, you go.  That’s the game.

Trump is so far outside this game, he’s so far outside the rules, he’s never been a player in this game.  He’s always been an outsider.  I heard people on Fox last night talking about this. “Who does he think he is?  He can’t control the media.”  I got news for you:  He is controlling the media, and it’s his objective.  He is controlling the media.  He controls the media when he’s not on it.  He controls the media when he is on it.  He controls the media when he’s asleep.  Nobody else has been able to do anything like this short of the Kennedys, and they’re pikers compared to the way Trump is doing this.

 

102815_krauthammer

The first Fox debate:

Here comes Megyn Kelly’s first question.  He didn’t hear anybody else get a question like that.  He never sees Hillary Clinton get a question like that.  He never hears Bill Clinton or another Democrat get a question like that.  So he answers it and says screw this.  I’m not putting myself in that position again.  Why should I?  I don’t have to.

But the rules of the game say when there’s a debate, you show up.  Screw the rules, he’s saying.  Why should I willingly give them another shot at me in a circumstance they control, why should I do it?  What’s the sense in it for me?  I’m leading; I’m running the pack here; why in the world should I put myself in that circumstance?  I’ve already seen what’s gonna happen.

The bottom line:

I don’t think it’s any more complicated than that.  I mean, there could be some personal things going on here that I don’t know about.  But just from the standpoint of knowing Trump, reading his book, and seeing how he operates elsewhere, in his mind, screw the rules, screw what’s expected, screw “This is just the way you do it.”  I’m not gonna put myself in a position go where I’m gonna be treated unfairly.  I don’t have to.  I’m Donald Trump.  Anybody can do this.  Ted Cruz could choose to do it if he wants to.  They just don’t.  Cruz and the rest of the pack are playing the rules of the game.  Trump is saying I don’t have to do it.  I don’t want to do it.  I don’t have any respect for these people.  What the hell.

megyn-kelly

In my opinion, Trump won this, and Fox is doubling down on stupid by devoting their entire evening programming yesterday to Donald Trump. Megyn interviewing Michael Moore with the epitome of stupid. They are doing exactly what Donald Trump was hoping for – it was all about him, all of the time, for hours, and for FREE!

Rush also said what we have all heard: that Donald is snubbing the people of Iowa by not showing up for the debate (I just heard Ted Cruz say it, reported on One America Network). Rush’s response:

He’s not avoiding the people of Iowa.  He’s all over Iowa.  The guy does more TV and radio than any other candidate out there.  So I don’t think there’s fear, and I don’t think it’s disrespect for the people of Iowa.  This is what it looks like when some guy stands up to the rules and the game and says, “Screw yours; I’m looking out for me first.  That’s all this is.  And you can say whatever you want, but I am not dumb.  I’m not gonna give you the gun and the bullet and stand still.  You want to hit me, come get me, but I’m not gonna put myself in your line of fire.”  That’s what he’s doing, if you ask me.

RUSH: We’ve just scratched the surface on this. There’s a lot to add to this because there’s new elements now to add to it.  But I routinely am asked in the e-mail by people in the audience, “Why don’t you do more TV?  You’re never on TV.”  And there’s an answer for that: “I don’t want to.”  The reason is, why would I go someplace where I know that exactly whatever they tell me they want to talk to me about, it’s not gonna be that?  Why would I go someplace that I know doesn’t support me, doesn’t like me, disagrees with me, would love to embarrass me or damage my show?

Rush went on to take calls on the subject.  I think he’s right. He made it as clear as possible: Donald did what he did, and he and I have similar opinions. What it boils down to:

I’m not gonna give you the gun and the bullet and stand still.  You want to hit me, come get me, but I’m not gonna put myself in your line of fire.”

 

trumpamericalovesyou

This entry was posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Rush Limbaugh: Trump Refuses to Play by the Rules

  1. auscitizenmom's avatar auscitizenmom says:

    I’m a little surprised that Rush said that.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. beaujest's avatar beaujest says:

    Rush said Trump owns the media,what he doesn’t say is that includes him also ! Banging on his desk for eight years to stop the Obama agenda,Trump arrives on the scene and El Rushbo sees Trump’s train steaming in that direction and refuses to get on !

    Liked by 1 person

  3. beaujest's avatar beaujest says:

    Many voters are tired of the same old politics in DC that Rush has always railed against .Trump represents the best chance to stop this political charade. Rush has not got onboard with Trump,so many have tuned him out like they have Fox and the networks !

    Like

    • Stella's avatar stella says:

      Did you read the post? Rush has never endorsed a candidate during the primaries, and he isn’t endorsing anyone this year either. He is attempting to be impartial, and I applaud him for it! The exact opposite would be Mark Levin, who is a shameless shill for Ted Cruz.

      Liked by 2 people

      • doodahdaze's avatar Howie says:

        Rush did not like the Omnicroneybus deal. He does not like Ryan. But he seems to not be against the idea of immigration reform with no deporting the millions but giving them non-voting legal status. He sort of buys in to the “secure the border” scam. He should stand back. We are pulling out and pushing forward.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Stella's avatar stella says:

          I would be interested to see transcripts of Rush saying this.

          Like

          • doodahdaze's avatar Howie says:

            No transcripts, but just my take from listening for years. If Trump takes it Rush will jump on to fight the Beest.

            Like

            • Stella's avatar stella says:

              Absolutely, he will, and no surprise there at all. Rush will support either Trump or Cruz, imo. And really – even though it isn’t a popular opinion here or on the tree – I’ll vote for Cruz if he’s nominated, just to stop Hillary Clinton. I don’t think Cruz will be nominated, and I’m not sure if he could stop her, but it would be worth a try.

              Like

      • doodahdaze's avatar Howie says:

        Your point is strong. Even if Rush “endorsed” Trump he would appear like Levin and Beck endorsing Cruz.

        Like

    • doodahdaze's avatar Howie says:

      Rush is not against the trade deals, never has been. Rush does not like anything populist, never has. He is a dyed in the wool republican. Always has been. He was against Perot big time. He liked the Boosh’s He probably likes Jebito. The good thing about Rush is he hates democrats.

      Like

      • Stella's avatar stella says:

        I was against Perot too. He elected Billy Jeff.

        Like

        • doodahdaze's avatar Howie says:

          But he was anti-NAFTA and he was dead right on that IMO. Billy Jeff got NAFTA done. Aided by the republicans. It was Read My Lips that elected Clintoon also I think. Bush said he would never raise taxes then went ahead and raised taxes. That hurt him. Hurt his credibility big time. I think we would be better off w/o any of these WTO deals myself.

          Liked by 1 person

  4. jeans2nd's avatar jeans2nd says:

    Reading this a year later, the obvious tipoff re: the first debate was Brett Baier and Baier’s first question. Kelly was just the afterthought.

    Re: Perot, it was someone next door – sorry, forget who – who said voting for Perot gave us Newt and the Contract With America. That sold me on Trump.

    As for Rush, even Rush did not get it. Those originally diagnosed and labeled incorrigible recognize fellow incorrigibles instantly :-).

    Thanks for the wayback machine, Stella.

    Like

Leave a reply to auscitizenmom Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.