After much confusion over who might be detained over the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the FBI announced they have a person of interest in custody, who is separate from the first person reportedly arrested during the shooting today.
After much confusion over who might be detained over the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the FBI announced they have a person of interest in custody, who is separate from the first person reportedly arrested during the shooting today.
This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on Wednesday.
Bystanders report seeing Kirk shot near his neck during a Q&A with students.
A suspect is in custody, according to a UVU alert sent to students. The campus has been evacuated.
“A single shot was fired on campus toward a visiting speaker. Police are investigating now, suspect in custody,” an alert from UVU said.

I am convince that we no longer receive six days of delivery by the post office. What do you think?
Last week the Postal Service posted a proposed rule in the Federal Register to revise the section of the Domestic Mail Manual that involves postmarking. The purpose of the rule, entitled “Postmarks and Postal Possession,” is to educate the public about postmarks. It discusses the history of postmarks, how they’re applied, how they’re used by government agencies and the private sector, and so on.
But all of this information serves primarily as background. The main purpose of the rule is to inform customers that they can no longer expect a postmark to show the date a piece was mailed.
Two groups representing the families of 9/11 victims hold a news conference to discuss the recent ruling that allows them to now sue the Saudi government for their involvement in the terror attacks.
Can you read this without crying? I couldn’t. Sobbing. Nose blowing. Yeah.
Continue reading
Day TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR of Presidential recovery.
Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett discusses her new book and life working on the Supreme Court on ‘Special Report.’