At 7pm Eastern, we will begin a 1 hour pre-announcement special followed by LIVE, uninterrupted coverage of the Supreme Court Announcement beginning at 8pm Eastern and a post-announcement, “Interactive Chat” beginning immediately after the event.
At 7pm Eastern, we will begin a 1 hour pre-announcement special followed by LIVE, uninterrupted coverage of the Supreme Court Announcement beginning at 8pm Eastern and a post-announcement, “Interactive Chat” beginning immediately after the event.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Lucille on It’s Doggityday! | |
Lucille on It’s Doggityday! | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
texan59 on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
WeeWeed on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
czarina33 on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on General Discussion, Tuesday, A… | |
Lucille on Exposing Ukraine’s Secret Poli… |
Very exciting! I’m glued to Lou Dobbs right now waiting for the news.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Here we go!
LikeLiked by 2 people
He’s an impressive man.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ahhhh! Our president!!!! 😊😊😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neil Gorsuch!
LikeLiked by 3 people
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/get-to-know-supreme-court-short-lister-neil-gorsuch/article/2612877
LikeLiked by 2 people
Via Drudge right now:
LikeLiked by 1 person
“That Judge Gorsuch’s judicial philosophy is similar to Justice Scalia’s is evident from a tribute the former gave after the latter’s death. In that tribute, Gorsuch summarized and endorsed Scalia’s method of legal interpretation:”
“Judges should instead strive (if humanly and so imperfectly) to apply the law as it is, focusing backward, not forward, and looking to text, structure, and history to decide what a reasonable reader at the time of the events in question would have understood the law to be — not to decide cases based on their own moral convictions or the policy consequences they believe might serve society best. As Justice Scalia put it, “if you’re going to be a good and faithful judge, you have to resign yourself to the fact that you’re not always going to like the conclusions you reach. If you like them all the time, you’re probably doing something wrong.”
LikeLiked by 3 people