[FULL INTERVIEW] Robby Mook Interviewed by Chris Wallace On “Fox News Sunday” (10/30/2016)

This entry was posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to [FULL INTERVIEW] Robby Mook Interviewed by Chris Wallace On “Fox News Sunday” (10/30/2016)

  1. hocuspocus13 says:

    You would ask Huma because it was her laptop…that’s rather elementary

    But come on folks do you really believe Crooked Hillary didn’t go on a tare after Huma

    Of course she did…šŸ˜ˆ

    Liked by 3 people

  2. hocuspocus13 says:

    Reblogged this on hocuspocus13 and commented:
    󾓦šŸŽƒó¾“¦

    Liked by 1 person

  3. lovely says:

    Shut up Robby Mook.

    The FBI can not reopen a case without compelling evidence.

    The FBI agents conducting the investigation into Hillary Clintons best friendā€™s husband ā€œAnthony the Pedophile Weinerā€ (PS why isnā€™t Hillaryā€™s judgement being called into question about the company she keeps) have seen the emails and they have given information to Director Comey which is legally compelling enough to cause Comey to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clintonā€™s misdeeds.

    The false narrative that Team Clinton is pushing about wanting Comey to show the world the emails is laughable mainly because Hillary has likely threatened to disembowel Lynch with her bare hands if Lynch gives Comey a warrant to read the emails and second even if and when Comey gets the warrant he can not legally release evidence in an active FBI investigation.

    Huma I believe is in deep trouble. It is only rumor that the file that the emails were found on was labeled ā€œLife Insuranceā€ but if it was then the emails are likely a bigger treasure trove of dirt on Clinton than Dick Morris has in his safety deposit box.

    Liked by 5 people

    • stella says:

      Apparently Bret Baier emailed Wallace while he was on the air. Weiner has given FBI permission to search computer so no warrant needed. @FoxNewsSunday

      Liked by 4 people

      • lovely says:

        Ha ha ha šŸ˜‚!

        I had not played that scenario in my head! That is sweet if it is true and I don’t doubt it. Weiner is fighting for his life. I believe they are going to get into some “letter of the law” difficulties as Weiner can give permission to the agents investigating him but does Weiner have legal authority (spousal property) to give that permission to Comey in a separate investigation that involves Hillary to read and use specific emails unrelated to the Weiner case.

        Take a look at Mook’s face when Cumo asks about Huma start it at the 1:35 mark. Huma is in big trouble. Huma is basically the walking dead if she does not find a way to protect herself.

        Liked by 2 people

    • hocuspocus13 says:

      Now you can correct me if I’m wrong

      But didn’t Loretta Lynch step down from this matter due to the tarmac situation

      Liked by 2 people

  4. hocuspocus13 says:

    Well they don’t call HUMA the MOLE for nothing

    Liked by 1 person

  5. lovely says:

    This is what Trump keeps repeatedly saying about Hillaryā€™s actions with the emails it was ā€œcriminal deliberate intentional and purposeful.ā€

    I think Trump has been involved in more litigation than any single non political figure in modern history. Trump chooses his words very carefully, no way he says this without enough knowledge to know that Hillary will not sue him for defamation.

    Remember Trump said months ago ā€œHuma is security risk because she is married to a pervert and Anthony Weiner and Huma share information.ā€

    Trump is Trump. I stand in awe.

    Liked by 4 people

  6. uhhhhhh…. mook is a dope.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. auscitizenmom says:

    This is so funny. The Clinton group is attacking Trump with things that are not even true. Then, they are hit with the things they have done, and they are aghast. LOL

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.